<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<rss version="2.0">
<channel>
<title>Typhoon HIL Forum - Recent questions in Model partitioning</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=questions/model-partitioning</link>
<description>Powered by Question2Answer</description>
<item>
<title>How to distribute burden on two CPUs (user and system) to address the CIO indication?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=386/how-distribute-burden-cpus-user-system-address-indication</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am working with Typhoon HIL 402 device (Configuration 4) to estimate the semiconductor losses&amp;nbsp;in a DAB converter. What I want is to operate the converter at 50 kHz. However, when I set the execution rate to 2e-5, it gives me the indication of CIO claiming of inaccurate readings (works fine with 5e-5). I tried to utilize the memory consumption between the two available CPUs as per this &lt;a rel=&quot;nofollow&quot; href=&quot;https://ticket.typhoon-hil.com/kb/faq.php?id=15&quot;&gt;link&lt;/a&gt;, but still the problem exists.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Now I am not sure whether I am doing the utilization&amp;nbsp;in the correct way. Any advice, comment regarding this is highly appreciated.&amp;nbsp;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Another doubt is whether the semiconductor loss estimation of Typhoon HIL accounts for the switching losses as well, if then, do I need to have a really small time step to capture the switching operation of the devices? Is this possible in a HIL 402 device?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thanks&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=386/how-distribute-burden-cpus-user-system-address-indication</guid>
<pubDate>Mon, 05 May 2025 15:18:32 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is it possible to adjust the size of a core coupling element?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=312/is-it-possible-to-adjust-the-size-of-a-core-coupling-element</link>
<description>Hello, &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Is it possible to adjust the size of the core coupling elements so that the spacing between the connectors is equal to the spacing between the modeling elements?&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
E.g., the spacing between the connectors of a four-phase core coupling element is significantly larger than the spacing of between the phases &amp;amp; neutral (A,B,C,N) of the Grid component in the Microgrid library. This situation creates strange routings of connections between the modeling elements.&lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
It seems that the size of coupling elements is not adjustable. &lt;br /&gt;
&lt;br /&gt;
Any hints?</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=312/is-it-possible-to-adjust-the-size-of-a-core-coupling-element</guid>
<pubDate>Thu, 23 Jan 2025 14:11:20 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
<item>
<title>Is there any way to use 2 Three phase inverter with Three Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (Open Winding)?</title>
<link>https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=307/there-inverter-permanent-magnet-synchronous-machine-winding</link>
<description>&lt;p&gt;Hello,&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;I am currently trying to simulate a Three Phase Permanent Magnet Synchronous Machine (Open Winding) driven by two Three Phase Inverters. The circuit I have configured shares a DC power source, and I am also analyzing the common mode current.&lt;br&gt;&lt;br&gt;&lt;img alt=&quot;&quot; src=&quot;https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=blob&amp;amp;qa_blobid=1809365649206353495&quot; style=&quot;height:258px; width:600px&quot;&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;The issue I am facing is that when I configure the circuit in this way, I encounter the following error:&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;&lt;strong&gt;Power Electronics Converters utilization: 6 out of 3 200.0%&lt;/strong&gt;&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Since I am using the Typhoon HIL 402 with configuration number 5, where the maximum converter weight is 3, I interpret that using two three-phase inverters exceeds this limit.&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Previously, I have simulated two three-phase inverters using the same HIL device with Core Coupling to control two independent motors. Is there any possible solution to resolve this issue in my current situation?&lt;/p&gt;&lt;p&gt;Thank you.&lt;/p&gt;</description>
<category>Model partitioning</category>
<guid isPermaLink="true">https://typhoon-hil.com/forum/?qa=307/there-inverter-permanent-magnet-synchronous-machine-winding</guid>
<pubDate>Tue, 21 Jan 2025 09:19:39 +0000</pubDate>
</item>
</channel>
</rss>